🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, observers and potential offenders loom up to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of headlights or torches as the police arrive, their faces and voices expressing caution or fear or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often incidentally glimpse the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have previously seen the streaming service real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an social media personality by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the police seemed surprisingly lenient with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of body cam film. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of Ajike Owens in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose children allegedly harassed and antagonized her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were repeatedly called, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The arresting officers found evidence that the suspect had done online research into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which allow residents and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The documentary builds its story with the body cam footage captured during the multiple officer calls to the scene before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by 911 audio material of Lorincz contacting authorities in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The film is showcased as an example of how self-defense regulations generate senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator notoriously said made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Gun Culture

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how little interest the police took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? How was the gun kept in her home? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her local residents a extended period, Lorincz was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is saved for the closing credits. A very sombre picture of American crime and punishment.